Five general principles for the Occupy protesters to discuss

When you look at the Occupy Wall Street protest and the cascading imitations now in play across North America, it would be a grand mistake to write the protesters off as misinformed. While in some cases, they are that, some are also well-intentioned.

Writing them off also risks missing at least two possible animating motivations that need to be addressed: a desire for equality and concern over poverty.

The Occupy protesters have a plethora of complaints, including how profit is private but financial losses are socialized, the existence of pollution, stagnating wages and home foreclosures.

But some demands can be contradictory. For example, more jobs and a better environment should not always be placed in opposition to each other. Entrepreneurs who invent ecologically-friendly technology are a good example of business and environmental interests working in concert.

On a more specific and recent issue – the disruption of land if an oil pipeline from Canada to the United States is built but which will put unemployed Americans back to work – protesters who want more jobs but also oppose disturbance to the landscape are not being realistic.

While I sympathize with the protesters’ concerns, those sincerely interested in creating a better world must understand that slogans, demands and a snap of the finger won’t do it. To reduce poverty, foment prosperity and avoid political favouritism for anyone, here are a few principles protesters should promote:

Principle One: Subsidize only people in need, never the wealthy or corporations. People occasionally need help. The debate comes down to who should do the helping. One thing that is clear, however, is who doesn’t need a subsidy: the wealthy and corporations. My rationale is not difficult to understand: the wealthy don’t need income transfers from taxpayers; as for companies, they are artificial entities which will rise and fall. So let them.

Real people work in companies and that’s the point: it is human beings down on their luck who should receive help, not corporations which come and go. Trying to ‘save’ corporations through taxpayer money only sets government up to intervene between competitors and to pick winners and losers.

Wall Street protesters are right to oppose the socialization of losses on Wall Street and the same goes for Detroit automakers and any other situation where private losses are paid for by taxpayers.

Principle Two: Be neutral in tax policy

Whether in Canada or the U.S., the personal and business tax codes are riddled with loopholes disguised as ‘tax credits, deductions’ and ‘exemptions.’ Regardless of where one thinks the overall tax levels should be, job creation (except for accountants) could be helped by broadening the tax base and simplifying collection. Lower, flatter and simpler taxes are always preferable to higher, convoluted and confusing taxes.

Principle Three: Always favour consumers over producers

Want cheaper food prices for the world’s poor? Then stop favouring farmers or anyone else with subsidies, protective barriers and ‘supply management’ boards (which are essentially cartels). All that does is protect the market share and prices of producers at the expense of consumers. Instead, embrace open competition.

Principle Four: Oppose government-sponsored “Ponzi” schemes.

Governments throwing another borrowed billion or trillion dollars at the economy is an attempt to generate political returns now at real costs to future generations. Such a ‘Ponzi’ scheme forces the last people in to pay for the services received by previous generations as well as their own, in the form of higher future taxes to pay off the debt.

Principle Five: Favour opportunity, wherever it appears.

Some Wall Street protesters decry so-called entry-level jobs but that’s an insult to those who hold them and who work hard to improve their lives. There is great dignity in all work, in any field.

So, in general, embrace opportunity. Look at what it did for Steve Jobs. Consider how he improved the world with his inventions and entrepreneurial drive. Ponder how many people’s lives he improved with employment and expanded opportunities.

Mark Milke is a senior fellow with the Fraser Institute.

Just Posted

Blackfalds RCMP investigate break and enter at Fas Gas

RCMP search for suspect who cut through an outside wall to gain access

Operating Budget focuses significantly on community safety

Proposed 2% tax increase for operating budget, debate runs in January

UPDATE: Red Deer RCMP investigate non-suspicious death downtown

48 St. behind transit terminal was closed off earlier Wednesday

Team Canada dancer returns to Red Deer laden with medals

Red Deer dancer wins three silver medals and a bronze at World Championship

Local author releases brand new international thriller

Retired teacher Larry Stewart hosting a book launch this Saturday

Troubled Monk releases new spirit

Troubled Spirit vodka was introduced in early December

Google searches suggest 2017 a tough year

What were Canadians were curious about: Google searches suggest 2017 a tough year

Democrat wins stunning red-state Alabama Senate upset

Democrat Doug Jones wins stunning red-state Alabama Senate upset against Roy Moore

New fighter-jet competition to have national ‘economic interest’ requirement

Trudeau government wants to replace Canada’s aging CF-18s with 88 new fighters by as early as 2025

The top-binged shows on Netflix in 2017

Which show did you cheat on your spouse with by watching ahead?

2017 word of the year: Feminism

Merriam-Webster’s word of the year for 2017: ‘Feminism’

200 Russians to compete in Olympics as neutrals

The Russian Olympic Committee expects 200 to compete in South Korea

Researchers claim the ‘man flu’ does exist

Review of scientific studies suggests ‘man flu’ may be more intense: researcher

Trudeau appoints Supreme Court chief justice

Prime Minister Trudeau appoints Richard Wagner as Supreme Court chief justice

Most Read